Google's approach to AI-generated content, especially for sensitive topics like financial information, focuses on the quality and reliability of the information provided, rather than strictly on whether the content is created by humans or AI.
Request a free Scorecard Report that looks at your online visibility and website structure today!
However, there are several specific guidelines and considerations that Google has outlined that impact how AI-generated content is treated, particularly in terms of search engine rankings.
Emphasis on E-A-T
Google emphasizes "Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness" (E-A-T) in its Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines. This is particularly critical for Your Money or Your Life (YMYL) topics, which include financial advice. Content that affects people's health, financial stability, or safety falls under this category. The source of the content, whether AI or human, must uphold high standards for accuracy and credibility.
Quality Over Source
While Google does not explicitly penalize AI-generated content, the company advises that the focus should always be on the quality of content. In a Google Search Central SEO hangout, it was mentioned that AI-generated content by financial advisors is treated like any other content. What matters is how helpful, accurate, and user-oriented the content is, regardless of how it was produced.
Potential for Misinformation
Given the sensitive nature of financial advice, there's a higher risk of misinformation when content is generated by AI without proper oversight. Google may scrutinize such content more closely to ensure it meets quality standards, especially if the AI-driven content is not edited by financial experts.
Recent Algorithm Updates
Google's algorithm updates often aim to improve the ability to identify high-quality content. Although these updates are not specifically targeted at AI-generated content, they reinforce the need for content to provide genuine value, be well-researched, and be accurate, particularly in sensitive fields like finance.
Conclusion
While Google does not inherently give higher ranks to financial content solely created by humans, the critical factors are the content’s quality, reliability, and adherence to E-A-T principles, especially for sensitive financial topics. Ensuring that AI-generated content is reviewed and verified by financial experts and compliance officers can help align with Google's guidelines and potentially achieve a higher page rank.
How Does The Copyleaks Service Impact Financial Advisor Content?
Copyleaks uses a comprehensive methodology to determine the percentage of content in a text that is human-written versus machine-generated. This is not considered a secret; the company provides some details about their methodology publicly. Here's how Copyleaks handles this measurement process.
AI Content Detection Percentage
Copyleaks' AI Content Detector can indicate the proportion of a financial advisor document that it deems to have been generated by AI. This is represented as a percentage, where, for example, a 50% result indicates that half of the document is detected as AI-generated. Financial advisors can also view specific sections of the text highlighted to show which parts are believed to be AI-generated.
Methodology
The detection is based on a sophisticated combination of technologies and techniques. This includes a proprietary AI detection algorithm trained on a vast amount of diverse training data, including academic assignments, marketing materials, and a wide range of internet content. This algorithm is continually refined and updated to stay effective against evolving AI writing styles and sophistication.
Linguistic Analysis and Plagiarism Checks
Besides pattern recognition through its AI detection algorithm, Copyleaks employs linguistic analysis to scrutinize the language used in texts. This helps identify unnatural phrasing that might indicate AI authorship. Additionally, the service includes plagiarism detection to identify repurposed content, which is common in AI-generated texts. This holistic approach helps ensure high accuracy in distinguishing between human and machine-written content.
Accuracy
The system boasts a high accuracy rate of 99.12%, indicating its effectiveness in detecting AI-generated content as part of its broader plagiarism and originality-checking services.
Conclusion
Copyleaks provides a clear insight into the composition of content, which is particularly useful in environments where the distinction between human and AI-generated text is critical. This transparency in their methodology helps users trust the accuracy and reliability of the results provided by their AI Content Detector.
How Is Copyscape Different Than Copyleaks?
Copyscape, a popular online plagiarism detection service, primarily measures the similarity between the text you submit and financial content available elsewhere on the internet to identify potential plagiarism. The service doesn't explicitly measure the "percent of human content" in the traditional sense of distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated text. Instead, it focuses on how much of a given text is unique or similar to existing content.
When Copyscape checks a document, it looks for exact matches or close similarities to other published texts available online. It then reports these findings usually as a percentage of text that matches sources elsewhere on the web. This percentage reflects the extent of overlap with other financial advisor texts, which indirectly could hint at non-original or copied material, but it does not directly assess whether the content is human-generated or created by AI or other automated processes.
If your concern is about distinguishing between human-written and machine-generated content, other tools or methodologies, like using linguistic analysis or machine learning models designed to detect AI-generated text, might be necessary. These tools analyze writing style, sentence structure, and other linguistic features to differentiate between human and computer-generated texts.
What are the top 3 questions financial advisors should be asking about services that measure machine versus human content?
When financial advisors are considering services that measure the effectiveness of machine-generated content versus human-created content, they should be focused on several key questions to understand the value, reliability, and appropriateness of such services. Following are the top three questions that could guide evaluations by financial advisors.
Accuracy and Reliability
How does the service measure and ensure the accuracy of content assessment between machines and humans?
Financial advisors should inquire about the methodologies used to compare and evaluate machine-generated content versus human-generated content. This includes understanding the metrics for assessing quality, relevance, and compliance with financial regulations. They should also ask about the validation process for these metrics and any historical performance data that demonstrates the reliability of the service.
Integration and Usability
How easily can this service be integrated into existing financial advisor workflows, and what is the learning curve for users?
It's important to understand how the service will fit into a financial advisor’s current business operations. This includes questions about software compatibility, the complexity of implementation, and the support provided during and after integration.
Financial advisors need to consider the usability of the service from both a technological and a practical standpoint to ensure it does not disrupt existing operations.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
What are the expected costs associated with using this service, and how do they compare to the anticipated benefits?
Advisors should evaluate the financial implications of adopting new digital technologies. This involves understanding the pricing structure of the service, potential return on investment, and how it might save time or resources compared to traditional methods. Financial advisors should be asking for case studies or examples where the service has added tangible value to businesses similar to theirs.
Conclusion
These questions help ensure that any investment in technology to differentiate between machine and human content is sound, adding value to the financial advisor’s business and aligning with industry standards, regulations, and client expectations.
Can AI written financial advisor blog articles rank on page one of Google?
The simple answer is yes, AI-written financial advisor blog articles can rank on page one of Google, but there are several important considerations to keep in mind to achieve this goal.
Quality and Relevance
Google's algorithms prioritize high-quality, relevant content. AI can generate articles that are informative and engaging, but the content must be tailored to meet the needs of the target audience and answer their questions effectively and concisely.
SEO Optimization
Like any other content, AI-generated blog articles by financial advisors need to be optimized for search engines. This includes using the right keywords, ensuring proper on-page SEO techniques (like meta tags, headers, and alt text), and structuring the content in a way that enhances readability and user engagement.
Originality
Google values original, high quality content above all else. AI tools can sometimes produce generic or derivative content if not properly guided or edited. To rank well, the content should be unique and offer new financial insights or perspectives that are not widely covered elsewhere.
User Experience
Google’s sophisticated algorithm also considers user experience signals such as click-through rates, time on page, and bounce rates. Even if a financial advisor article is well-written and optimized, it needs to be compelling enough to keep readers engaged.
Consistency and Freshness
Posting regularly and keeping the content fresh is important for maintaining high rankings. Google tends to favor financial advisor websites that consistently update their content.
Length of Document
Google generally prefers longer blog articles that provide more comprehensive information on a specific financial topic. This preference is rooted in Google's aim to offer its users the most relevant and informative content. Longer articles are often viewed by Google's algorithms as more likely to contain detailed insights and thorough analysis, which can help them rank higher in search results.
Additionally, detailed content can lead to better user engagement metrics like longer time on page and lower bounce rates, which are favorable for SEO. However, the quality of the content, its relevance to the search query, and its adherence to SEO best practices are also crucial factors in determining how well an article performs in search results.
Compliance and Ethics
In industries like financial services, compliance with regulatory standards and ethical considerations are crucial. AI-generated content must be reviewed to ensure it meets industry-specific guidelines and does not provide misleading, illegal, or harmful advice.
Human Oversight
Although AI can draft articles, human oversight is critical. Editing for tone, style, factual accuracy, and overall coherence is necessary to ensure the final content meets the highest standards of the financial service industry.
Conclusion
Using AI as a tool in content creation can enhance productivity and efficiency, but successful integration of AI-generated content into a high-ranking strategy involves careful planning, execution, and ongoing management.
About Paladin
Copyleaks and Copyscape services are integrated into Paladin’s content marketing services for financial advisors.
